Nokian Hakka Green 185/60 R15 88S
![]() |
Choose Size tyre
Nokian Hakka Green 185/60 R15 88S | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
The information in the model description is for reference purposes.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Nokian 2026 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Nokian.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Nokian 2026 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Nokian.

How to Choose Summer TiresIn this tyres review we will tell you about main criteria to consider when choosing the right summer tyres for your car

Subsidiary brands of leading tyre companiesTyres from sub-brands have the same qualities as the products of the parent companies
Model overview based on user reviews
The Nokian Hakka Green tires are highly regarded for their quietness, softness, and excellent road grip, especially in wet conditions. Many users appreciate their low noise level, high steering sensitivity, and good directional stability. They are noted for reducing fuel consumption and offering a smooth ride, with some users experiencing a decrease in fuel usage. While they are praised for their resistance to aquaplaning and excellent braking on both dry and wet asphalt, some users have noted that they can be noisy on rough surfaces and have thin sidewalls that may not handle rough terrain well. Despite these minor drawbacks, the tires are considered a great value for their price, offering a good balance of performance and affordability. Overall, the Nokian Hakka Green is recommended for those seeking eco-friendly, reliable, and comfortable tires for everyday driving.
Pros
Cons
1 6 7 9 |
I was choosing between Contipremiumcontact2 and Green. On the Conti, I covered more than 60,000 km, with 1 mm left to the limit. The tires were a bit hard, and bad roads contributed to the wear. The tires were amazing. But once I drove into a puddle (the wear was about 30-40%), it was scary, they aquaplaned, but everything turned out fine, and the decisive factor for the choice was the replacement period of the tires, that if I was on a business trip and the weather changed suddenly, I wouldn't have to worry or regret not changing them. I'm not a pro, but the facts speak for themselves. Good luck to you all on the roads. Quiet, soft, smoothes out road bumps, today there was heavy rain with strong wind gusts, holds the road excellently, braking is top-notch, rolls great. I've been driving it since 03/16. Covered 800km, not much but very pleased I chose it. I'll see how it wears. Fuel consumption on the Škoda Roomster 1.4 decreased from 6.7 to 6.2 (6.0l/100km) at a speed of 90-100km/h. Tested on the same route. Not noticeable yet. |
Yesterday I bought one for my Lacetti, and the tires turned out to be quite inexpensive, cheaper than Michelin and some Kumho even more expensive! I drove a few kilometers and realized this is what I need! I haven't measured the fuel consumption yet, but I like how the car runs! In a word - supeeerb, for a brand of this level!) Quiet, soft, not rubber, just chic suspiciously cheap, winter tires of this brand cost like premium class. |
Writing as the owner of these tires. There's nothing special about them, just ordinary tires, they didn't affect fuel consumption at all. The only advantage is that they're cheaper than similar competitors from less prestigious brands. That's why I chose Nokian; it's inexpensive and performs just like Kumho! Cheap, new model, well-known brand, non-directional pattern the fuel did not save at all, not even half a liter... |
3 out of 23 user review(s) shown
10 more user review(s)
Video reviews




































