Kamille 2052 0.38 L
 | Outdated Product Type: thermos mug; Volume (ml): 380; Opening/supply: cover; Flask material: stainless steel; Material: stainless steel; Carrying handle; |
 |
Kamille 2052 0.38 L 0.48 L | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
The information in the model description is for reference purposes.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Kamille 2026 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Kamille.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Kamille 2026 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Kamille.
Model overview based on user reviews
The Kamille 2052 0.38 L thermos mug is a compact and stylish option for those on the go. Made from durable stainless steel, it offers a comfortable grip, making it easy to hold. Users appreciate its portability and the fact that it fits well in the hand. However, some have noted that the lid can be uncomfortable and twists poorly, especially when filled with liquid, which can make drinking less convenient. Despite these concerns, many find it a reliable choice for maintaining the temperature of beverages for extended periods. Overall, the Kamille 2052 is a practical choice for everyday use, though potential buyers should be aware of the lid's design limitations.
Pros
Cons
2 0 1 1 |
The lid is uncomfortable. Fits well in the hand It twists very badly, especially if there is a lot of liquid ... Drinking from it is also not very convenient ... I regret that I bought use Kamille 2051 few months |
I am very pleased with the mug, the child used it for 2 years, but the lid burst on the thread .. I think she served her purpose for everything Comfortable in the hand when drinking liquid on the road does not spill up to the ears No use Kamille 2051 more than year |
Keeps temperature for over 12 hours. Comfortable to hold in hand - |
3 out of 4 user review(s) shown
1 more user review(s)
We recommendCompare using chart →
