Dark mode
United Kingdom
Catalog   /   Computing   /   Components   /   Graphics Cards

Comparison XFX Radeon RX 6800 XT RX-68XTAQFD9 vs Asus Radeon RX 6800 XT TUF OC

Add to comparison
XFX Radeon RX 6800 XT RX-68XTAQFD9
Asus Radeon RX 6800 XT TUF OC
XFX Radeon RX 6800 XT RX-68XTAQFD9Asus Radeon RX 6800 XT TUF OC
from £523.57 
Outdated Product
from £494.99 
Outdated Product
TOP sellers
InterfacePCI-E v4.0PCI-E v4.0
GPU
GPU modelAMD Radeon RX 6800 XTAMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
ArchitectureBig Navi (RDNA 2)Big Navi (RDNA 2)
Memory size16 GB16 GB
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
GPU clock speed2250 MHz2340 MHz
Memory clock16000 MHz16000 MHz
Lithography7 nm7 nm
Max. resolution7680x4320 px7680x4320 px
Passmark G3D Mark24194 score(s)24194 score(s)
Connections
HDMI11
HDMI versionv.2.1v.2.1
DisplayPort23
DisplayPort versionv.1.4v.1.4a
USB C1
Software
DirectX12 Ultimate12 Ultimate
OpenGL4.64.6
VR
Stream processors46084608
Texture units288288
General
Monitors connection44
CrossFire/SLI
Coolingactive (fan)active (fan)
Fans33
Lighting
Lighting syncAsus Aura Sync
Additional power8 + 8 pin8 + 8 pin
Minimum PSU recommendation750 W750 W
Number of slots2.73
Length340 mm320 mm
Added to E-Catalogfebruary 2022march 2021

GPU clock speed

The frequency of the graphics processor of the graphics card. As a general rule, the higher the frequency of the GPU, the higher the performance of the graphics card, but this parameter is not the only one — a lot also depends on the design features of the graphics card, in particular, the type and amount of video memory (see the relevant glossary items). As a result, it is not unusual for a model with a lower processor frequency to be more performant of two video cards. In addition, it should be noted that high-frequency processors also have high heat dissipation, which requires the use of powerful cooling systems.

DisplayPort

The number of DisplayPort outputs provided by the graphics card.

DisplayPort is a digital media interface similar in many ways to HDMI, but primarily used in computers. The specific capabilities of this interface depend on the version (see below), but even in the most modest modern version of DisplayPort, it allows at least 4K at 60 frames per second and 5K at 30 fps. Another interesting feature of this standard is the ability to daisy-chain multiple screens to one port (“daisy chain” format).

In light of the latter, we can say that the number of DisplayPort outputs corresponds to the number of screens that can be connected directly to the graphics card, without using a daisy chain. Such a connection may be required, in particular, for monitors that do not support daisy chaining. If such a mode is supported, the maximum number of screens will be at least twice as high as the number of connectors. However, it is worth considering that the resolutions supported by the video adapter itself may not reach the maximum capabilities of the DisplayPort version used.

DisplayPort version

The version of the DisplayPort and/or miniDisplayPort interface used by the graphics card. For the interfaces themselves, see the relevant help items; here we recall that they differ only in the type of plug. So the list of versions for both cases is the same, it looks like this:

— v 1.2. The earliest widely used version (2010). However, already in this version, 3D compatibility and the daisy chain mode appeared. The maximum fully supported resolution when connecting a single monitor is 5K (30 fps), transmission up to 8K is possible with certain restrictions; a frame rate of 60 Hz is supported up to a resolution of 3840x2160, and 120 Hz — up to 2560x1600. And when using daisy chain, you can connect up to 2 2560x1600 screens at 60 frames per second or up to 4 1920x1200 screens at the same time. In addition to the original version 1.2, there is an improved v 1.2a, the main innovation of which was support for AMD FreeSync, a technology used in AMD video cards to synchronize the refresh rate of the monitor with the actual frame rate output by the video adapter.

— v 1.3. An update introduced in 2014. The increased bandwidth made it possible to provide full, without restrictions, support for 8K at 30 fps, as well as transmit 4K images at 120 fps, sufficient for 3D work. Resolutions in daisy chain mode have also increased — up to 4K (3840x2160) at 60 fps for two screens and 2560x1600 at the same frame rate for four. Of the specific innovations, it is worth me...ntioning the Dual Mode mode, which allows you to connect HDMI and DVI devices to such a connector through the simplest passive adapters.

— v 1.4.Version introduced in March 2016. Formally, the bandwidth has not increased compared to the previous version, but thanks to signal optimization, it became possible to work with 4K and 5K resolutions at 240 fps and with 8K at 120 fps. However for this, the connected screen must support DSC encoding technology — otherwise, the available resolutions will not differ from version 1.3. In addition, v 1.4 added support for a number of special features, including HDR10, and the maximum number of simultaneously transmitted audio channels increased to 32.

—v 1.4a. An update released in 2018 "quietly" — without even an official press release. The main innovation was the update of Display Stream Compression technology from version 1.2 to version 1.2a.

USB C

The number of USB Type C outputs provided in the graphics card.

Note that USB Type C is only a type of physical connector; specific methods of its application may be different, they should be clarified separately. However, most video cards with this feature have VR support (see below), and this connector is used in them just to connect virtual reality glasses and helmets. Another use case is somewhat less common — connecting monitors via the Thunderbolt v3 interface: this version uses a Type C hardware connector. In both cases, there is usually only one output of this type — this is quite enough.

Lighting sync

Backlight synchronization technology provided in a graphics card with an associated design.

By itself, synchronization allows you to "match" the backlight of the graphics card with the backlight of other system components — the motherboard, case, keyboard, mouse, etc. Thanks to this matching, all components can change colour synchronously, turn on / off at the same time, etc. Specific features the operation of such backlighting depends on the synchronization technology used, and, usually, each manufacturer has its own (Mystic Light Sync for MSI, RGB Fusion for Gigabyte, etc.). The compatibility of the components also depends on this: they must all support the same technology. So the easiest way to achieve backlight compatibility is to collect components from the same manufacturer.

Number of slots

The number of slots occupied by the graphics card on the back of the system unit.

This indicator allows you to estimate the amount of space required to install a video adapter. It is relevant in the light of the fact that modern video cards can have a fairly extensive set of connectors, and for this set there has long been little standard lanyard for 1 slot. This is especially true for powerful performant models. Thus, many solutions, especially mid-range and top-end ones, occupy two or even three slots at once.

Separately, it is worth touching on models for which the characteristics indicate a fractional number of slots — usually 2.5 or 2.7. This detail is provided by the manufacturer for promotional purposes — as confirmation that the graphics card is smaller than a full-fledged 3-slot solution. However, in fact there is no difference between these options: adapters for 2.5 or 2.7 slots still block the third slot (albeit partially), making it unusable.

Length

The total length of the graphics card.

In this case, the length means the size of the device from the plate with connectors (which is attached to the back wall of the system unit) to the opposite side. The plate itself and the outwardly protruding connectors are usually not taken into account.

Data on the length of the graphics card is needed primarily in order to assess whether there is enough space for it in a particular case. In addition, longer boards, usually, have more advanced characteristics (although there is no hard dependence here, and video adapters of similar class may have different lengths). As for specific values, the most compact solutions nowadays have a size of 150 – 200 mm or less ; an indicator of 200 – 250 mm can still be considered relatively small, 250 – 290 mm — medium, and many models (mostly advanced) have a length of more than 290 mm.
XFX Radeon RX 6800 XT RX-68XTAQFD9 often compared
Asus Radeon RX 6800 XT TUF OC often compared