Comparison Sig Sauer Tango MSR 1-10x26 BDC10 vs Sig Sauer Tango MSR 1-10x28 BDC10

The diameter of the objective is the front lens of the sight. This parameter is also called "aperture".

This parameter is important primarily for optical sights and their specialized varieties — "night lights" and thermal imagers (see "Type"). The larger the lens, the more light enters it, the higher the image quality and the more efficient the device will work in low light, but the more expensive such optics will cost. It is worth noting here that the requirements for the aperture also depend on the degree of magnification: in other words, especially large lenses are not required for low magnifications. Therefore, relatively small entrance lenses, with a diameter of 25 – 35 mm and even less, are found in all price categories of classical optics — from low-cost to top. And you can compare by aperture only models with the same maximum magnification, and even then it’s very approximate — it’s worth remembering that image quality also depends heavily on the overall quality of the sight components.

In turn, for night sights, especially those based on image intensifier tubes (see "The principle of operation of night vision devices"), a large aperture is fundamentally important. So a diameter of 36 to 45 mm is considered very small for such devices and is found only in some digital models, while most nightlights are equipped with lenses of 46 mm or more.

As for collimators, the size of the space that enters the scope depends mainly on the aperture. Moreover, the actual visible size can be changed by setting the sight closer or farther to the eye — the principle of operation of collimators makes this possible. Note also that for models with lenses of a rectangular or similar shape, the size of the lens is usually indicated diagonally.

The diameter of the exit pupil created by the optical system of the sight.

The exit pupil is called the projection of the front lens of the lens, built by the optics in the region of the eyepiece; this image can be observed in the form of a characteristic light circle, if you look into the eyepiece not close, but from a distance of 30 – 40 cm. The diameter of this circle can be calculated by dividing the lens diameter by the multiplicity (see above). For example, an 8x40 model would have a pupil diameter of 40/8=5mm. This indicator determines the overall aperture of the device and, accordingly, the image quality in low light: the larger the pupil diameter, the brighter the “picture” will be (of course, with the same lens quality, because it also affects the brightness).

In addition, it is believed that the diameter of the exit pupil should be no less than that of the pupil of the human eye — and the size of the latter can vary. So, in daylight, the pupil in the eye has a size of 2-3 mm, and in the dark — 7-8 mm in adolescents and adults, and about 5 mm in the elderly. This point should be taken into account when choosing a model for specific conditions: after all, high-aperture optics are expensive, and it hardly makes sense to overpay for a large pupil if you need a scope exclusively for daytime use.

The offset is the distance between the eyepiece lens and the exit pupil of an optical instrument (see "Exit Pupil Diameter"). Optimum image quality is achieved when the exit pupil is projected directly into the observer's eye; so from a practical point of view, offset is the distance from the eye to the eyepiece lens that provides the best visibility and does not darken the edges (vignetting). A large offset is especially important if the sight is planned to be used simultaneously with glasses — after all, in such cases it is not possible to bring the eyepiece close to the eye, and it must be at some distance from the glasses so as not to hit the glass due to recoil.

The diameter of the area visible through the sight from a distance of 100 m — in other words, the largest distance between two points at which they can be seen simultaneously from this distance. It is also called "linear field of view". This indicator is more convenient for many users than the angular field of view (the angle between the lines connecting the lens and the extreme points of the visible image) — it very clearly describes the capabilities of the device.

In sights with magnification adjustment (see above), both the entire range of width — from maximum to minimum — or only one value of this parameter can be indicated. In the latter case, the largest width of the field of view is usually taken, at the minimum magnification.

A complex indicator that describes the quality of any optical system (including sights) at dusk — when the lighting is weaker than during the day, but not yet as dim as in the deep evening or at night. It is primarily about the ability to see small details through the device.

The need to use this parameter is due to the fact that twilight is a special condition. In daylight, the visibility of small details is determined primarily by the magnification of the optics, and in night light, by the diameter of the lens (see above); at dusk, both of these indicators affect the quality. This feature takes into account the twilight factor. Its specific value is calculated as the square root of the product of the multiplicity and the diameter of the lens. For example, for an 8x40 scope, the twilight factor would be the root of 8x40=320, which is approximately 17.8. Models with adjustable magnification (see above) usually indicate the minimum twilight factor corresponding to the minimum magnification.

The lowest value of this parameter for normal visibility at dusk is considered to be 17. At the same time, it is worth noting that the twilight factor does not take into account the actual light transmission of the system — and it strongly depends on the quality of the lenses, the use of antireflection coatings (see below), etc. Therefore, the actual image quality at dusk for two models with the same twilight factor may differ markedly.

The location of the reticle in the optical sight (see "Type").

Such a grid can be installed either in the first focal plane, FFP(roughly speaking, in the lens area), or in the second, SFP(in the eyepiece area). At the same time, for sights with a fixed magnification, the difference between these options is only in price, so they use only the simpler and cheaper SFP. But in models with multiplicity adjustment, this parameter directly affects the application features, and we will analyze this difference in more detail:

— In the 1st focal plane (FFP). The key advantage of reticles in the first focal plane is that their apparent size also changes in direct proportion with a change in magnification. In fact, this means that the angular dimensions of the individual mesh elements remain the same regardless of the set magnification. That is, for example, if a distance of 1 MRAD is claimed between two neighboring points, then it will be 1 MRAD in the entire range of multiplicity adjustment. This means that you can work with the grid for measuring distances and taking corrections according to the same rules, regardless of the selected degree of increase. Thus, FFP sights are much more convenient and easier to use than SFP. On the other hand, such models are noticeably more complex and expensive; and many hunting reticles — for example, a duplex or a classic cross (see "Reticle Type") — it makes...no sense at all to install in the first focal plane. In light of all this, this option is relatively rare and only in mid-range and top-level models designed for high-precision shooting.

— In the 2nd focal plane (SFP). The most common reticle placement option, including variable magnification sights. Such popularity is primarily due to the simplicity of design and low cost. However, the reverse side of these advantages are additional difficulties when using goniometric mesh elements. The fact is that in SFP sights, the apparent size of such elements remains unchanged when the magnification changes, which means that the dimensions of individual parts at different magnifications will correspond to different angles. More precisely, the angular dimensions in such systems change in inverse proportion to the multiplicity: for example, if at a multiplicity of 5x the distance between two adjacent points is 6 MOA, then at 15x it will decrease to 2 MOA. Thus, the “true” angular size indicated in the characteristics, the marking elements have only at a strictly defined multiplicity, in other cases, this size must be recalculated using special formulas. At the same time, it is worth noting that if the grid does not have special goniometric elements, then this disadvantage becomes practically irrelevant for it; examples are hunting nets of the "half-cross" type (traditional, not "stump") and "cross with a circle" (see "Net type").

Units of measurement that are used in the marking of goniometric elements of the reticle. In our time, there are two main units: - MOA. The abbreviation for minute of arc is 1/60 of a degree. Initially, this unit is associated with the English system of measures and is convenient primarily for calculations in yards and inches: at a distance of 100 yards, an angle of 1 MOA corresponds to a linear dimension of approximately 1 inch. In the more familiar metric system for us, this gives 2.91 cm at a distance of 100 m. We also note that this unit is a kind of accuracy standard: it is believed that a full-fledged sniper rifle should give a spread of no more than 1 MOA.

— MRAD. Conventional designation miradian - an angle of one thousandth of a radian (approximately 0.06 °). Also in the jargon of snipers, this unit is called "thousandth", or "mil". It is already tied to the metric system: at a distance of 100 m, an angle of 1 MRAD corresponds to a linear size of 10 cm (approximately 3.5 times greater than 1 MOA).

The choice for this indicator largely depends on the personal preferences of the shooter. We also note that inconsistencies are often found in low-cost sights: their drums are marked on the MOA scale, and the reticle is in MRAD units.