Comparison Kormoran Snow 205/60 R16 92H vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 205/60 R16 92H

Clear Table
Add to comparison
	Kormoran Snow 205/60 R16 92H	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 205/60 R16 92H
	from £90.78 Outdated Product	from £242.99 Outdated Product
all specs only differences
TOP sellers	Find prices on Amazon.uk Find prices on eBay.uk	Find prices on Amazon.uk Find prices on eBay.uk
Season	winter	winter
Product Type	passenger car / SUV	passenger car / SUV
Width	205 mm	205 mm
Aspect ratio	60 %	60 %
Tyre inner diameter	16 "	16 "
Load index	92	92
Speed rating	H	H
Orientation	directional	directional
Pattern Symmetry	symmetric	symmetric
Fuel efficiency	D	E
Wet Grip	C	C
Noise Level	72 dB	72 dB
Added to E-Catalog	june 2018	august 2012

Price comparison

Fuel efficiency

The rolling resistance rating that the tyre corresponds to. The higher this figure, the lower the resistance, the less fuel is spent to overcome it and the more economical the tyre is. Efficiency indices are denoted by letters of the Latin alphabet in descending order of efficiency: A(highest efficiency), B, C, D, E, F, G(lowest efficiency).

With other things being equal, more economical tyres tend to cost more, but the difference is offset by fuel economy.