Dark mode
United Kingdom
Catalog   /   Computing   /   Components   /   Graphics Cards

Comparison Palit GeForce GTX 1060 Dual 3GB vs Palit GeForce GTX 1060 JetStream 3GB

Add to comparison
Palit GeForce GTX 1060 Dual 3GB
Palit GeForce GTX 1060 JetStream 3GB
Palit GeForce GTX 1060 Dual 3GBPalit GeForce GTX 1060 JetStream 3GB
from $251.20 up to $255.36
Outdated Product
Outdated Product
User reviews
TOP sellers
InterfacePCI-E v3.0PCI-E v3.0
GPU
GPU modelNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060
Memory size3 GB3 GB
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory bus192 bit192 bit
GPU clock speed1506 MHz1506 MHz
Memory clock8000 MHz8000 MHz
Lithography16 nm16 nm
Max. resolution7680x4320 px7680x4320 px
Passmark G3D Mark8966 score(s)8966 score(s)
Connections
DVI-D11
HDMI11
DisplayPort33
Software
DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5
VR
Stream processors11521152
Stream processor version55
Texture units7272
General
Monitors connection44
Coolingactive (fan)active (fan)
Fans22
Power consumption120 W120 W
Additional power6 pin6 pin
Minimum PSU recommendation400 W
Number of slots22.5
Length252 mm248 mm
Added to E-Catalogaugust 2016august 2016

Minimum PSU recommendation

The smallest power supply recommended for a computer with this graphics card.

This parameter, usually, is much higher than the power consumption of the graphics card itself. This is natural — after all, the PSU must provide electricity to the entire system, not just the video adapter. At the same time, the higher the power of the graphics card, the inevitably higher the power consumption of the PC as a whole. Moreover, this is due not only to the “voracity” of the graphics adapter itself, but also to the consumption of other PC components: a high-end graphics card, usually, is combined with an equally powerful (and energy-intensive) system.

With this in mind, manufacturers indicate the minimum recommended power supply. Of course, such recommendations are not mandatory; however, when using a PSU with a power lower than the recommended one, the probability of malfunctions increases significantly — to the point that even a very limited system may simply “not start”.

Number of slots

The number of slots occupied by the graphics card on the back of the system unit.

This indicator allows you to estimate the amount of space required to install a video adapter. It is relevant in the light of the fact that modern video cards can have a fairly extensive set of connectors, and for this set there has long been little standard lanyard for 1 slot. This is especially true for powerful performant models. Thus, many solutions, especially mid-range and top-end ones, occupy two or even three slots at once.

Separately, it is worth touching on models for which the characteristics indicate a fractional number of slots — usually 2.5 or 2.7. This detail is provided by the manufacturer for promotional purposes — as confirmation that the graphics card is smaller than a full-fledged 3-slot solution. However, in fact there is no difference between these options: adapters for 2.5 or 2.7 slots still block the third slot (albeit partially), making it unusable.

Length

The total length of the graphics card.

In this case, the length means the size of the device from the plate with connectors (which is attached to the back wall of the system unit) to the opposite side. The plate itself and the outwardly protruding connectors are usually not taken into account.

Data on the length of the graphics card is needed primarily in order to assess whether there is enough space for it in a particular case. In addition, longer boards, usually, have more advanced characteristics (although there is no hard dependence here, and video adapters of similar class may have different lengths). As for specific values, the most compact solutions nowadays have a size of 150 – 200 mm or less ; an indicator of 200 – 250 mm can still be considered relatively small, 250 – 290 mm — medium, and many models (mostly advanced) have a length of more than 290 mm.
Palit GeForce GTX 1060 Dual 3GB often compared
Palit GeForce GTX 1060 JetStream 3GB often compared