Comparison In-Sink-Erator Model 46 vs In-Sink-Erator Model 56
Add to comparison |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| In-Sink-Erator Model 46 | In-Sink-Erator Model 56 | |
| Compare prices 1 | from £200.47 | |
| User reviews | ||
| TOP sellers | ||
Easy installation. Air switch included. Low noise level. High reliability. There is no reverse mechanism. | ||
| Power | 0.55 hp | 0.55 hp |
| Number of revolutions | 925 rpm | 1425 rpm |
| Chamber capacity | 980 mL | 980 mL |
| Grinding stages | 1 | 1 |
| Chamber material | plastic | plastic |
| Overload protection |  | |
| Dimensions (HxD) | 318x159 mm | 318x173 mm |
| Weight | 7 kg | 7.2 kg |
| Manufacturer's warranty | 2 years | 3 years |
| Added to E-Catalog | november 2015 | november 2015 |
Compare In-Sink-Erator Model 46 and Model 56
Comparing In-Sink-Erator Model 46 and Model 56, it can be noted that both models have a power of 0.55 HP and a chamber capacity of 980 ml. However, Model 56 operates at a higher speed — 1425 RPM compared to 925 RPM for Model 46. It is also worth noting that Model 56 has a longer warranty — 3 years compared to 2 years for Model 46. Both devices have overload protection, but they differ in weight: Model 56 weighs 7.2 kg, while Model 46 weighs 7 kg.
Price comparison
You may be interested in
In-Sink-Erator Model 46 often compared
In-Sink-Erator Model 56 often compared
Glossary
Number of revolutions
The motor shaft's nominal speed is a crucial factor in the operation of the waste disposal unit, as it determines the speed of processing. Models with higher nominal speeds can process waste faster than those with lower speeds, provided that their power and other features are equal. However, high speed can also lead to increased noise levels and a reduced ability to handle solid particles.