Comparison Vaillant recoVAIR VAR 60/1 D vs SmartMi Fresh Air System

— Supply and exhaust with recuperator. Units that provide air movement in both directions — for supply and exhaust, and thus solve all the main tasks of ventilation. First of all, they are convenient when organizing a ventilation system from scratch, when any equipment is missing. On the other hand, ventilation recovery units turn out to be noticeably more expensive, heavier, larger and higher consumption than purely air supply units, which is especially noticeable on large centralized units (see “System”). However, even among them, this variety is found quite often. However, decentralized ventilation installations are mostly made of supply and exhaust units. First, they do not require a high air flow, and the device can be made relatively small and inexpensive. Secondly, when organizing decentralized ventilation, it is easier to entrust all tasks to one unit than to provide separate modules for supply and exhaust. The same type, in addition to working on the supply and exhaust, prevents the "blowing out" of heat from the room during the cold season. The principle of operation of the recuperator is that it takes energy from the blown air and transfers it to the incoming one. Thus, ventilation sends relatively cool air out and supplies preheated air into the room. The use of the recuperator can significantly reduce heat loss and, accordingly, heating costs — the amount of heat returned in the most advanced hea...t exchangers can reach 97% (see "Heat exchanger efficiency"). At the same time, such systems are often passive and do not consume energy themselves (and where it is required, the consumption is still lower than the amount of saved heat).

— Supply and exhaust. Devices similar to those described above, but not equipped with a recuperator. They are less common and are quite rare.

— Supply. Units responsible only for supplying external air to the room; the air extraction must be provided either by additional equipment or in a natural way. This option is the most popular for centralized models: separate supply and exhaust units can be easier to place in a limited space than a powerful and bulky supply and exhaust unit. From the point of view of the general organization of air movement, such a “separation of roles” is also often optimal (not to mention the fact that in some cases special equipment for exhaust may not be required). However, there are very few decentralized supply models.

The diameter of the holes intended for connecting air ducts to the ventilation unit. The more performant the air ventilation unit, the more air the ducts must pass and the larger, usually, the mounting holes. For wall-mounted models (see above), this parameter determines the size of the channel that must be drilled into the wall to accommodate the unit.

Class of air purification, which corresponds to the supply and exhaust unit.

This parameter characterizes how well the unit is able to clean the air supplied to the room from dust and other microparticles. Most often it is specified according to the EN 779 standard, and the most common classes in ventilation units are as follows:

— G3. Marking G denotes coarse filters designed for rooms with low requirements for air purity and retaining particles with a size of 10 microns or more. In residential ventilation systems, such devices can only be used as pre-filters; additional equipment will be required for additional purification. Class G3 is the second most efficient coarse cleaning class, it means a filter that removes from the air 80 – 90% of the so-called synthetic dust (test dust on which filters are tested).

— G4. The most effective class of coarse filters (see above), which involves the removal of at least 90% of particles of 10 microns or more in size from the air.

— F5. Classes with index F correspond to fine cleaning, the effectiveness of which is assessed by the ability to remove particles from the air with a size of 1 µm. Such filters can already be used for post-purification of air in residential premises, including even hospital wards (without increased cleanliness requirements). F5 is...the lowest of these classes, suggesting an efficiency of removing such dust at the level of 40 – 60%.

— F6. Fine cleaning class (see above), removal from the air of 60 – 80% of particles with a size of 1 µm.

— F7. Fine cleaning class (see above), corresponding to the removal of 80 – 90% of dust from the air with a size of 1 µm.

— F8. Fine cleaning class (see above), providing the removal of 90 to 95% of dust from the air with a size of 1 µm and above.

— F9. The most efficient class of fine cleaning; the higher efficiency corresponds to the ultra-fine cleaning class H (see below). Class F9 achieves dust removal efficiency of 1 µm at 95% and above.

– H10 – H13. Classes H are used to mark filters of ultra-fine (absolute) purification (HEPA filters) capable of removing particles of the order of 0.1 - 0.3 microns in size from the air. Such filters are used in rooms with special requirements for air purity – laboratories, operating rooms, high-precision industries, etc. In filters corresponding to the H10 class, the efficiency of cleaning from the mentioned particles is 85%. H11 claims 95% absorption. And class H12 and H13 are the most efficient with particle retention of at least 99.95% and 99.99% respectively.

— Carbon filters. Created on the basis of activated carbon or other similar adsorbent. Effectively trap volatile molecules of various substances, thanks to which they perfectly eliminate odors. Carbon filters are subject to mandatory replacement after the resource is exhausted, since if the service life is exceeded, they themselves can become a source of harmful substances.

It is a sensor for monitoring the degree of indoor air pollution from dust.

Based on the information received from the air pollution sensor, a comfortable and safe environment is maintained in the serviced premises.

The lowest performance with which the supply-exhaust unit can operate.

For performance in general, see "Maximum air flow". Here we note that it makes sense to indicate the minimum flow only in cases where the amount of air passed can be regulated (see "Number of fan speeds"). And even then, for such models, this parameter is not always given.

The highest performance of the air ventilation unit; or, if the air flow control is not provided for in the design, the nominal capacity of the unit.

In this case, air flow refers to the amount of air that the unit can pass through itself per hour. The optimal air flow value for each room is calculated by the formula "room volume multiplied by the air exchange rate"; the air flow must not be lower than this indicator; otherwise, we cannot talk about effective ventilation. The volume is easy to calculate by multiplying the area of the room by the height of the ceilings, and the multiplicity indicates how many times per hour the air in the ventilated space should be updated. It depends on the type and purpose of the room: for example, a multiplicity of 1 is enough for a residential apartment, and at least 4 is required for a pool (there are special tables by which you can determine the multiplicity for each type of room). Thus, for example, for an apartment with a living area of 70 m², a ceiling height of 2.5 m and a kitchen of 9 m² (air exchange rate of at least 2), a duct of at least 70*2.5*1+9*2.5*2=220 m³ (excluding bathroom and toilet, they have their requirements for multiplicity).

It should be noted that a certain flow margin (about 10–15%) will not be superfluous, but it hardly makes sense to chase higher rates — after all, performance requires appropriate power, which, in turn, affects the dimensions, price and...energy consumption of the installation.

The noise level produced by the air ventilation unit in normal operation.

This parameter is indicated in decibels, while the decibel is a non-linear unit: for example, a 10 dB increase gives a 100 times increase in sound pressure level. Therefore, it is best to evaluate the actual noise level using special tables.

The quietest modern ventilation units produce about 27–30 dB — this is comparable to the ticking of a wall clock and allows you to use such equipment without restrictions even in residential premises (this noise does not exceed the relevant sanitary standards). 40dB is the daytime noise limit for residential areas, comparable to average speech volume. 55–60 dB — the norm for offices, corresponds to the level of loud speech or sound background on a secondary city street without heavy traffic. And in the loudest, they give out 75–80 dB, which is comparable to a loud scream or the noise of a truck engine. There are also more detailed comparison tables.

When choosing according to the noise level, it should be taken into account that the noise from the air movement through the ducts can be added to the noise of the ventilation unit itself. This is especially true for centralized systems (see "System"), where the length of the ducts can be significant.

The type of heat exchanger used in the heat exchanger of the ventilation unit (see "Features").

— Plate. The simplest and most common type of heat exchanger is based on the use of metal plates that separate the incoming and outgoing air into narrow channels. Such heat exchangers are inexpensive, do not require an electrical connection and are almost silent. However, a classic plastic or metal heat exchanger has a relatively low efficiency (about 45 – 80%), “blows out” moisture from the room (which may require the use of humidifiers), and in frosty weather ice forms on the plates, and it is necessary to turn off the heat exchanger, letting air in bypassing it (for this, an automatic bypass is often provided). The last two shortcomings are devoid of plate heat exchangers made of cellulose — they do not freeze; moreover, they retain not only heat but moisture in the room, and the efficiency can reach 92%. On the other hand, cellulose heat exchangers are not applicable in swimming pools and other areas with high humidity.

— Rotary. Heat exchangers, the operation of which is based on the rotation of a disc of a special design. At the same time, each part of the heat exchanger alternately works to cool the exhaust air and then to heat the supply air. Such a system has a higher efficiency than plate heat exchangers, it is more compact, it returns most of the moisture coming out with the exhau...st air and does not freeze in cold weather. On the other hand, due to the complexity of the design, rotary heat exchangers are more expensive and less reliable, in addition, they require power supply and produce some additional noise (although most often not much).

— Ceramic. Advanced recuperators based on highly efficient ceramic materials used in decentralized air ventilation units (see "System"). A feature of such recuperators is that they transfer to the supply air not only the apparent but also the latent heat of the exhaust air (latent heat is released due to moisture condensation). It made it possible to achieve impressive efficiency indicators — from 90% and above. The main disadvantage of ceramic heat exchangers is the high cost due to the complexity of production.

— Tubular. Heat exchanger based on a bundle of thin metal tubes of great length placed in a casing. Usually, outdoor air is supplied through such tubes to the room, and the air from the room on the way out moves between the tubes, transferring heat to them. In such devices, you can achieve a fairly solid efficiency — 70% and above; even though tubular heat exchangers are relatively simple in design and reliable. They appeared relatively recently and, for the most part, have not yet received significant distribution.

The heat transfer efficiency, energy saving indicators and service life of the unit directly depend on the material of the heat exchanger. Most often, heat exchangers of supply and exhaust units are made of the following materials:

- Aluminum. Aluminum is a lightweight metal with good thermal conductivity for efficient heat transfer between air streams. Aluminum heat exchangers quickly respond to temperature changes due to rapid heating and cooling, but just as quickly condense in a humid environment. In addition, aluminum dust particles, when released into the air, pose a potential threat to the human respiratory system.

— Cellulose. Heat exchangers made of cellulose are lightweight and extremely inexpensive to manufacture. However, in terms of thermal conductivity and wear resistance, cellulose is an ineffective material and is therefore quite rare. On a separate line, it is important to mention that cellulose tends to absorb unpleasant odors, and its cleaning process does not involve washing or other contact with water.

— Ceramics. Ceramics as a material for the manufacture of heat exchangers is valued for its wear resistance and high safety, but the cost of such models is often very high. In terms of heat transfer efficiency, ceramics can be called the “golden mean” - it is capable of quickly accumulating heat, but also retains it well, witho...ut completely releasing it to the supply air. This advantage turns into a disadvantage when recovering cold air during the heating period.

- Copper. Heat exchangers made of copper are characterized by high thermal conductivity - copper accumulates and releases heat best, but also cools down just as quickly. The downside of large temperature changes is the formation of condensation, which at low temperatures leads to freezing and a complete stop of ventilation. To avoid freezing, additional heating is used, and this often leads to increased power consumption. However, copper heat exchangers provide the highest efficiency (over 90%), prevent the formation of viral, fungal and bacteriological air pollutants due to natural antiseptic properties, and withstand many years of use. In terms of their combination of qualities, copper heat exchangers are among the best in their class.

— Polystyrene. Some air handling units may use heat exchangers with plates made of plastic, polystyrene and other polymer-based materials. They are lightweight and corrosion resistant, but often have lower thermal conductivity. Another flaw in such materials is that many viruses and bacteria can remain viable for quite a long time on the plastic surfaces of the heat exchanger.