Dark mode
United Kingdom
Catalog   /   Tools & Gardening   /   Garden Tools   /   Garden Shears

Comparison Fiskars 1023624 vs Fiskars 115390

Add to comparison
Fiskars 1023624
Fiskars 115390
Fiskars 1023624Fiskars 115390
Compare prices 3Compare prices 1
TOP sellers
Typepole sawpole saw
Designtwo-handedtwo-handed
Pole saw driveinternal driveinternal drive
Specs
Max. cutting diameter32 mm32 mm
Max. pole saw cutting height6 m4 m
Detachable blade
Blade adjustment
Spring
General
Handle materialaluminiumaluminium
Handle materialrubber
Pole
Length4000 mm2322 mm
Weight1900 g1140 g
Added to E-Catalogseptember 2018march 2016

Max. pole saw cutting height

The maximum height that the pole saw (see "Type") can reach while standing on the ground, without the use of ladders or other attachments.

This parameter is usually indicated by manufacturers according to the following principle: “the length of the rod plus the height of a person with arms raised” (usually 2–2.5 m is taken for a person’s height). When choosing according to cutting heights, note that more “long-range” tools are usually heavier, bulkier and more expensive than relatively short counterparts. So the headroom does not hurt, but it should not be too large.

It is also worth noting that the cutting height is indicated relatively rarely — mainly in the largest and longest tools, where this figure is 3 m or more. In shorter models, the range can be derived using the already mentioned formula "length plus height of the user with arms raised."

Handle material

The material from which the additional overlays for the tool handle are made. Most often, this material differs from the material of the handle itself (see above), but there are exceptions — for example, additional plastic lining on the plastic handle. Anyway, the most popular types of materials are as follows:

— Rubber. Convenient, practical and inexpensive, and therefore — an extremely popular material. Secure to hold and at the same time relatively soft, making it great for both plastic and metal handles: rubber grips do not slip in the hand, do not cool the skin in cool weather and provide additional comfort due to the softness. The disadvantages of rubber include poor scratch resistance and a slightly higher cost than another popular option — plastic. However, in general, these shortcomings cannot be called critical.

— Plastic. Another fairly popular material, widely used primarily with steel and aluminium handles. Plastic provides a secure hold, it does not slip in the hand like metal; in addition, such pads are not afraid of moisture and can also play the role of additional protection against corrosion. However plastic is harder than rubber and somewhat less reliable and durable; On the other hand, it also costs much less.

— Wood. A material rarely used, mainly with metal (steel) handles. The tree is very attractive in terms of convenience: it is pleasant to the touch, does not cool the hands and almost does not slip. On the other hand, su...ch pads are less reliable than rubber or plastic ones, they do not tolerate moisture (the material can swell and warp) and contact with sharp objects (slivers can form, threatening splinters). So it makes sense to specifically look for wooden handles, first of all, if you are a principled adherent of the classics.

— Cork. The cork does not slip in the hands and perfectly absorbs moisture, thanks to which it is securely held in the hands. In addition, this material is soft and elastic, which gives additional convenience and comfort. At the same time, compared to the same rubber, cork is less durable: it is relatively easily damaged and, without special care, quickly absorbs dirt, which can cause it to lose its “presentation” and then its working properties. As a result, cork overlays are extremely rare — in some models of garden tools.
Fiskars 1023624 often compared
Fiskars 115390 often compared