Comparison Braun Breakfast1 WK 1100 2200 W 1.7 L vs Philips Series 3000 HD9318/00 white

Clear Table
Add to comparison
	Braun Breakfast1 WK 1100 2200 W 1.7 L	Philips Series 3000 HD9318/00 white
	from £26.00 up to £55.05 Compare prices 6	from £21.99 up to £54.88 Compare prices 2
all specs only differences
TOP sellers	CoffeeFriend.co.uk £26.00 Buy in shop Tradeinn.com £27.00 Buy in shop Idealo.co.uk £26.00 Buy in shop	Idealo.co.uk £22.00 Buy in shop Joom UK £55.00 Buy in shop
Main	Rapid water boiling system. Ergonomic nose. Measuring scale in liters and number of cups.	Measuring scale in liters and number of cups.
Type	Electric Kettle	Electric Kettle
Volume	1.7 L	1.7 L
Technical specs
Power consumption	2200 W	2200 W
Heating element	hidden	hidden
Coating of the heating element	stainless steel	stainless steel
Water level indicator	+	+
Opening the lid with a button
General
Body shape	cylindrical	conical
Material	plastic	plastic
Cable length		0.75 m
Dimensions		25x23x16 cm
Weight		0.9 kg
Color
Added to E-Catalog	june 2021	september 2020

Price comparison

Body shape

The general shape of the body of the electric kettle.

— Conical. The most popular option: a body is wide at the base and tapering upwards. This form contributes to stability: the centre of gravity is maximally displaced downwards. However washing such a kettle from the inside may not be very convenient due to the relatively small size of the opening in the upper part.

— Cylindrical. The cylindrical shape provides more or less the same width of the body at the base and at the top. With the same height and base diameter, such kettles hold slightly more water than conical ones; in addition, such a device is easier to clean due to the wide opening for the lid.

— Inclined. The body which is inclined forward; the width of such a body is usually more or less the same over the entire height. Such kettles have an unusual, eye-catching appearance; in addition, it is easier to pour water from them — the device must be inclined at a smaller angle than with a cylindrical and even with a conical body. However, this option does not provide fundamental advantages over the same cylindrical shape, but it is more expensive, and therefore is not common.