Comparison Apple Magic Mouse 2 USB C (2024) vs Apple Magic Mouse 2 (2021)
Add to comparison | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Magic Mouse 2 USB C (2024) | Apple Magic Mouse 2 (2021) | |
| Compare prices 29 | Compare prices 10 | |
| User reviews | ||
| TOP sellers | ||
The only difference from the Magic Mouse 2 (2021) is the charging port on the body — USB-C instead of Lightning. | Magic Mouse 2 (2021) is an updated version of the Magic Mouse 2 (2015) featuring a USB-C cable instead of USB-A and an expanded color palette matching the iMac 24". Technically, both mice are identical in functionality and design. | |
| Product type | mouse | mouse |
| Connection | Bluetooth | Bluetooth |
| Sensor | laser | laser |
| Type | notebook | notebook |
Sensor and control | ||
| Sensor resolution | 1000 DPI | 1000 DPI |
| Touchpad | ||
Additional features | ||
| Suitable for left-handers | ||
| Left handed | ||
Connection and power supply | ||
| Power source | battery | battery |
| Battery life | 30 days | 30 days |
| Port on the device | USB-C | Lightning |
General | ||
| In box | USB-A dongle | USB-A dongle |
| Size (LxWxH) | 114x57x22 mm | 114x57x22 mm |
| Weight | 99 g | 99 g |
| Color | ||
| Added to E-Catalog | november 2024 | september 2021 |
Compare Apple Magic Mouse 2 USB C (2024) and Magic Mouse 2 (2021)
Apple Magic Mouse 4 and Apple Magic Mouse 3 have similar features such as connection type (Bluetooth), operating range (10 m), sensor resolution (1000 DPI), and also a rechargeable power source with up to 30 days of use. Both devices feature a touch surface and have the same dimensions and weight. However, the Magic Mouse 4 is available in a greater number of stores and offers on E-Katalog, which may indicate its wider availability. Otherwise, users note the similarity in functionality and ease of use of both mice.
Price comparison
You may be interested in
My comparisons
Apple Magic Mouse 2 (2021) often compared
Glossary
Port on the device
Connector on the mouse body for detachable cable connection; it is found in both wired models and wireless ones with a battery, where through this port the mouse charges and, if necessary, operates "wired" without delays.
— microUSB. One of the miniature versions of the USB connector, still popular in gadgets despite the emergence of the more advanced USB-C. It has comparatively modest capabilities (specifically, it falls short of USB-C in terms of maximum possible charging power), however, this is rarely critical. Meanwhile, there are a plethora of cables and chargers for microUSB.
— USB-C. The latest (as of the end of 2025) type of USB connector. It is symmetrical, allowing the cable to be inserted either way, eliminating the possibility of incorrect connection. USB-C is more reliable, has an extended lifespan, and supports higher data transfer and charging speed. Additionally, it is compatible with modern devices and is gradually becoming a universal standard, making mice with such a connector more convenient and relevant for users.
— microUSB. One of the miniature versions of the USB connector, still popular in gadgets despite the emergence of the more advanced USB-C. It has comparatively modest capabilities (specifically, it falls short of USB-C in terms of maximum possible charging power), however, this is rarely critical. Meanwhile, there are a plethora of cables and chargers for microUSB.
— USB-C. The latest (as of the end of 2025) type of USB connector. It is symmetrical, allowing the cable to be inserted either way, eliminating the possibility of incorrect connection. USB-C is more reliable, has an extended lifespan, and supports higher data transfer and charging speed. Additionally, it is compatible with modern devices and is gradually becoming a universal standard, making mice with such a connector more convenient and relevant for users.




