LG 55UR762H 55 "
Photos 10 |
LG 55UR762H 55 "
Screen:55 ", 3840x2160 px, 60 Hz, Direct LED
Picture:4K upscaling, HDR
Multimedia:T2 tuner, Smart TV, LAN
All specifications
Specifications 55UR762H
|
|
Information in model description is for reference purposes.
Before buying always check characteristics and configuration of product with online store manager
Catalog LG 2025 - new products, best sales and most actual models LG.
Before buying always check characteristics and configuration of product with online store manager
Catalog LG 2025 - new products, best sales and most actual models LG.
Which TV sensor is the best? And which one is optimal in terms of price and quality?We study the pros and cons of modern TV matrices
How to choose a TV diagonal and resolution for your room?Is it always worth taking a larger TV? Perhaps 55" will be too much for a small room, but 32" is a perfect option?
Buy LG 55UR762H 55 "
All prices 7 →When you make a purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
Lg Ur76 55 " 3840 X 2160 Pixels 4K Ultra Hd Hdr10 Pro Hdmi Usb Hospitality Tv 55UR762H3 | £552.03 | ||||
LG UR76 55 Inch 3840 x 2160 Pixels 4K Ultra HD HDR10 Pro HDMI USB | £513.49 | ||||
LG 55UR762H hospitality TV 139.7 cm (55") 4K Ultra HD 400 cd/m² S | £525.98 | ||||
LG 55UR762H3ZC UR762H Series - 55" - Pro:Centric with Integrated Pro:Idiom LED-backlit LCD TV - 4K - for hotel / hospitality | £557.98 | ||||
LG 55UR762H hospitality TV 139.7 cm (55") 4K Ultra HD 400 cd/m Smart TV Black 10 W | £605.98 | ||||
LG 55UR762H3ZC 139.7 cm (55") 4K Ultra HD 400 cd/m² Smart TV Blac 55UR762H3 | £508.54 | ||||
LG 55UR762H3ZC 139.7 cm (55") 4K Ultra HD 400 cd/m Smart TV Black 10 W 55UR762H3ZC.AEK | £505.17 |
LG 55UR762H configurations
Price for LG 55UR762H | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
LG 43UR762H 43 " | from £365.98 | 9 offers | ||
LG 50UR762H 50 " | from £465.55 | 7 offers | ||
LG 55UR762H 55 " | from £505.17 | 7 offers | ||
LG 65UR762H 65 " | from £713.94 | 2 offers | ||
LG 75UR762H 75 " | from £1,240.56 | 5 offers |
We recommendCompare using chart →