AMD Ryzen 7 Matisse 3700X OEM (100-000000071)
![]() | Buy! AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8C/16T 360-440GHz Tray - 100-000000071 100-000000071Amazon.co.ukDelivery: to United Kingdom Report |
AMD Ryzen 7 Matisse 3700X OEM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The processor, created using the 7-nm process technology and introduced in 2019, is the junior 8-core solution of the Matisse (Zen 2) line. It is characterized by low power consumption and heat dissipation (up to 65W), which simplifies the choice of a suitable cooler, not included in the package. Thanks to the support of multithreading, each of the eight CPU cores can execute two command threads simultaneously.
The clock frequency of the AMD Ryzen 7 Matisse 3700X OEM processor is 3.6 GHz, with the possibility of an automatic boost under loads up to 4.4 GHz. Additional overclocking potential is provided by an unlocked multiplier. Other features of the model include a solid amount of cache memory (32 MB of third level and 4 MB of second level), support for DDR4 3200 MHz RAM format, and compatibility with various motherboards with the AM4 socket. The CPU can become an optimal solution for professional use and working with resource-intensive applications for video and photo editing, rendering, archiving large volumes of data, etc.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog AMD 2026 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models AMD.


0 3 1 6 |
You don’t have to drive it because there will be no difference in games, especially since almost all cores there are boosted to 4.4, but when rendering or work tasks there is still a difference. Works stably at 4250MHz 1.35v -Performance The difference is enormous compared to my previous I-3 4030u. - Hot Under the water cooler Celsius+ S36 Dynamic and overclocked to 4250MHz 1.35v, it ran stably; in OCCT during the stress test, it was around 75 degrees. However, during the same stress test in Aida 64, the temperature soared to 95 degrees. (The water cooler was at maximum speed, the computer in performance mode, made a sandwich with 6 fans, the situation changed by only 3 degrees). |
The best cpu from amd (after the r5 3600x) in my opinion. It works divinely, on par with the i9 9900k, but is cheaper, unlike the i7 8700k it is cooler and cheaper. It lags behind coffe lake by 300 MHz (i7-5 GHz, r7 4.7 GHz in manual overclocking) doesn’t care. About the price: it’s a little bit not justified, you can throw off 3k (bought for 30,000 thousand rubles), as for the motherboard, I took asrock steel legend on the B450, everything works, just update the BIOS and dropsy or don’t forget deepcool gammaxx gt. 5) Stable overclocking Price |
I got myself a 3700X box for my setup: - Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) - Crucial Ballistix DDR4 2x16Gb BL2K16G32C16U4B - Kingston A2000 M.2 SA2000M8/500G I bought all this to replace my old 3570K with overclocking and 16GB (4x4). For some reason, on my new Asus motherboard, the voltage was set to the max for the processor, over 1.4V. I'm puzzled why the factory does this because, with such a setup, the CPU and chipset on the motherboard would heat up to 50-60°C just with Chrome and Photoshop running under a load not exceeding 20-30%. After adjusting it manually to 1.25V, it immediately dropped by 10°C without any loss of performance. Overall, compared to the old one, it works faster, but I never felt it was twice as fast, and now I'm wondering why I bothered with the 3700X. I could have just as easily gone for the 3600X or Intel 10500. Since I occasionally do video rendering with my GTX1070 Founders, both the new and old CPUs render 1 hour of video in Premiere in about 10 minutes, with the CPU load at 50-60%. So, can someone tell me what those 8 cores and 16 threads are actually doing when the time is almost the same on the old 4-core processor? Okay, let's remove the GPU from rendering, and what do I see? 100% CPU load and 1 hour to render = 1 hour, which is exactly what I got with the old CPU... This is a fiasco for AMD. Basically, the point of buying this CPU is nearly zero because the performance gain is maybe 15-20%, at most 30% with DDR4 memory over 7 years... - We'll assume it's 7nm, I hope they're really there - 8 cores, still more than 4 in my old CPU and make it a bit faster - It's cheaper than Intel, but that doesn't mean much in fact - A decent cooler included, if you don't have a good one, this will do for a while - AMD sticker =) - 16 threads of nonsense and everyday realities to the back seat - 65W TDP nonsense because on b550 motherboards it heats up like a demon (hello AMD heaters, and I thought this wasn't an issue with the new ones) at 1.4V. And this is considering I have it under Noctua NH-D14 and two 140mm Fractal Design intake fans in the case. Even lowering the voltage, I think it should run cooler. - It's not worth buying it, better to get a cheaper option and with the saved money, get a decent graphics card (RTX 2060 Super or higher) and a fast SSD, you'll get more real benefit. - Lack of integrated video, some might say it's unnecessary but in critical moments, this thing is a lifesaver. - Watched loads of video reviews and comparisons, thought I was getting a plane but ended up with a meh processor.. Someone might say it's an excellent chip but I disagree because in my practical usage scenarios, it doesn't prove to be. It's just a hyped and overrated Ryzen. |
AMD Ryzen 7 Matisse configurations
| Price for AMD Ryzen 7 Matisse | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 Matisse 3700X BOX | from £437.00 | 3 offers | ||
| AMD Ryzen 7 Matisse 3700X OEM | from £215.00 | 1 offer | ||
| AMD Ryzen 7 Matisse 3800X MPK | from £199.99 | 1 offer | ||











































