Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake i5-11600K BOX
 | Compare prices 2 → When you make a purchase through links on our site, we may receive a affiliate commission.
|
Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake i5-11600K BOX | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Multithreading. Unlocked multiplier. Support for PCIe 4 bus and DDR4-3200 memory. Velocity Boost Technology.
The information in the model description is for reference purposes.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Intel 2026 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Intel.
Always clarify the specifications and configuration of the product with the online store manager before purchasing.
Catalog Intel 2026 - new arrivals, bestsellers, and the most relevant models Intel.
Guide to Intel Core Processor Architectures and SocketsUnderstanding Intel generations and sockets: which processors to consider for purchase and which to avoid.
How to choose a CPU?How to choose the right CPU for any task, from spreadsheets to modern games and work applications
AccessoriesAll accessories for Intel i5-11600K BOX →
Model overview based on user reviews
The Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake series is highly praised for its cost-performance ratio, offering significant productivity and performance improvements over previous generations. Users appreciate the integrated graphics, which allow for decent gaming experiences without a dedicated GPU. However, many reviews highlight the high power consumption and heat generation, with actual power draw often exceeding the specified 65 watts, reaching up to 160 watts under load. Effective cooling solutions are recommended to manage the heat. Despite these concerns, the processors are considered a great value, especially when compared to competitors like AMD's Ryzen series, and are suitable for both gaming and multitasking. Overall, the Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake CPUs are seen as a solid choice for those seeking a balance between performance and price, with the caveat of ensuring adequate cooling.
Pros
Cons
0 1 1 11 |
Performance - my old 10400f tears it to shreds, FPS and stability in games have increased significantly. The integrated graphics allow you to finally play something, it handles PoE, Raft, and even Minecraft with a hundred mods (and that's a very resource-demanding beast, trust me), so there's plenty to play. Price - a little lower than the competitor like the 5600x, and if you take the non-K version, the offer is even more attractive. Now, it's not necessary to get a Z-chipset for fast memory; boards on B560 support its overclocking and are reasonably priced. Heating and wild consumption. The Dark Rock 4 Pro barely copes with it, even at stock, holding around 76-82 degrees in AIDA, with brief spikes to nearly 90. It doesn't particularly want to undervolt either, it seems Intel sends pretty tight chips on the lower series. Initially, a DeepCool Gammax EX 400 was installed, and with it, it managed to throttle at stock. Once again - at stock, power limits were set to Intel's. The new memory controller and its gear modes are like those on the tenth generation; you can't just plug in any high-speed stick and enable XMP. Above 3600, there's a high probability you'll have to switch to Gear 2 mode and deal with drops in memory performance, spending long evenings tweaking the timings. All that's left is for someone to release a calculator, and it will be a true Ryzen experience. Although I experienced drops at any frequency and mode until I moved from Z490 (updated BIOS for 11th generation, tried several versions) to Z590 - so much for promised compatibility, although ASRock might have messed something up.  Narin Snow: use Intel i5-11600K BOX few months |
Bought for 6000₴ Motherboard with a B560 socket The processor is very good. But I have a 200W cooler, I unlocked the processor power consumption in the BIOS. At load, it consumes 150-170W. I recommend buying. Cost/Performance A powerful tower is needed to deliver potential VladPod: use Intel i5-11400F BOX less than month |
Took 08.2021, for 6k UAH. At that time it was more profitable than the 3600x, even if you count with the motherboard. After the fufiks, I didn’t want to contact AMD again. Cold with a simple Gammaxx GTE V2. Performance is top-notch; I didn't find any tasks that would justify paying extra for an i7. The platform was more advantageous than Ryzen. Installed and forgot (sounds like a joke, but it's true, over time you want to enjoy the computer, not spend evenings in the BIOS, squeezing a few extra megahertz and running AIDA64). No David Skryabin: use Intel i5-11400F BOX more than year |
3 out of 13 user review(s) shown
10 more user review(s)
Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake configurations
| Price for Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake i5-11400 BOX | from £180.90 | 1 offer | |
| Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake i5-11400F BOX | from £99.95 | 2 offers | |
| Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake i5-11400F OEM | from £148.88 | 1 offer | |
| Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake i5-11600 BOX | from £188.00 | 3 offers | |
| Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake i5-11600K BOX | from £175.00 | 2 offers | |
| Intel Core i5 Rocket Lake i5-11600KF BOX | from £175.00 | 4 offers | |
Video reviews
i5-11400 vs i5-11600K — The Rocket Lake CPU You Should Buy
5 April 2021127 968 view
Intel Screwed It Up: Rocket Lake 11th-gen Launch Discussion
3 April 2021122 190 view
i5-11400 vs i5-11600K The Rocket Lake CPU You Should Buy
5 April 2021109 889 view
Intel i9-10900K - Rocket Lake Steps BACKWARDS!
15 January 2021107 054 view
Intel i9-10900K - Rocket Lake Steps BACKWARDS!
15 January 2021106 561 view
MSI Z590-A PRO - Review of the motherboard - Good All-Rounder - Intel Rocket Lake
26 March 202143 665 view
Ultimate 4K Gaming PC Build with Intel Rocket Lake [HINDI] India 2021
25 June 202138 702 view
Intel Rocket Lake Preview Analysis: Only Good Pricing will make this a Good Product next to Zen 3…
12 January 202135 243 view
Leo Says Ep 60: Intel Rocket Lake could have been worse
9 April 202127 242 view
Leo Says Ep 60: Intel Rocket Lake could have been worse
9 April 202127 190 view
Rocket Lake is a Success for Intel
2 April 202125 953 view
The Intel Rocket Lake Giveaway Build!
20 April 202113 792 view
Intel’s Rocket Lake Will Have 10nm+ Technology at 14nm and a Max of 8 Cores?
3 December 201911 227 view
Intel made it! Intel Rocket lake i7 11700K Review!
22 March 20218 114 view
Intel Rocket Lake 8 Cores & Other Info Leaks | Chris Hook Leaves Intel | RX 5500 Launches December
28 November 20195 722 view
Intel i9 11900k & i5 11600k Rocket Lake-S Review
30 March 20213 152 view
Intel Rocket Lake-S Final Specs Leak, Performance Benchmarks and Price Leaks.
1 March 20211 703 view
Intel 11th Gen Rocket Lake to Fight Back? - Monday Logins with MOBHouse
21 December 20201 265 view
Intel Rocket Lake Press Review Kit Revealed
26 February 20211 180 view
Rocket Lake Benchmark Comparison - Intel Core i5 11400F vs. i5 11600K vs. i9 11900K
19 April 20211 077 view
Intel Core i5 11400F 11th gen Rocket Lake Unboxing and Review!
7 April 2021980 view
Intel Core i5 11400F 11th gen Rocket Lake Unboxing and Review!
7 April 2021838 view
Intel Rocket Lake S benchmark leaks - will Intel regain the gaming crown from AMD?
23 February 2021820 view
Where did Intel Rocket Lake Go Wrong?
7 June 2021615 view
Intel 11th Gen Rocket Lake Launched: Is it a Success or Failure?
5 April 2021541 view
Rocket Lake Benchmark Comparison - Intel Core i5 11400F vs. i5 11600K vs. i9 11900K
19 April 2021374 view
Unboxing Processor Intel Rocket Lake, Core i5 11500 2.7GHz box
14 June 2021155 view
Intel 11th Gen Rocket Lake-S Review Roundup (Maybe Wait For Alder Lake?)
2 April 2021146 view
Intel 11th gen or Rocket Lake desktop CPU in Bangla | Full details & comparison.
13 April 2021143 view
Intel 11th Gen Rocket Lake-S Review Roundup (Maybe Wait For Alder Lake?)
2 April 2021139 view
Optimal gaming processor from the Rocket Lake family
The Intel Core i5-11600K processor is based on the Rocket Lake architecture and boasts an unlocked multiplier with manual overclocking. It is manufactured using the 14 nm process technology and is compatible with motherboards based on the LGA 1200 socket, on which the tenth generation of Intel Core was also based. Like all Core i5 chips released over the past 2 years, it is equipped with not 4, but 6 physical cores and supports Hyper-Threading core virtualization technology, thanks to which the total number of cores increases to 12 pcs. All this is seasoned with support for Turbo Boost technology, thanks to which the processor can automatically overclock to 4.9 GHz.
Flexible auto-acceleration using the Velocity Boost method
However, automatic overclocking here is not quite the same as before. Together with the 11th generation of Intel Core, the company's engineers came up with a new technology for unlimited auto-overclocking Velocity Boost. In this mode, the processor keeps peak frequencies for all cores much more stable, but at the same time, power consumption increases and the Core i5-11600K turns into a full-fledged 150-padded jacket at the level of last year's Core i7 models. Accordingly, the requirements for the system also increase - you definitely need a motherboard with a serious power subsystem and VRM cooling, and the stock cooler will have to be changed to a full-fledged tower.
Support for PCIe 4.0 bus and DDR4-3200 memory
All this leads us to one clear conclusion - Core i5 has ceased to be office processors for several years now. We bend our fingers: we have support for the PCIe 4.0 bus and DDR4-3200 memory, activated multithreading, improved auto overclocking and an extended power consumption limit. Well, the price has remained plus or minus at the same level as 3-4 years ago. We were able to find a brand new sample in select stores for as little as $250, making it one of the most affordable 12-thread processors on the market.
We recommend
Intel LGA 1200, cores 6, threads 12, 4.1 GHz, TurboBoost 4.8 GHz, process technology 14 nm, UHD Graphics 630, unlocked multiplier, integrated graphics, multithreading, TDP 125 W, memory RAM: maximum 128 GB, DDR4 2666 MHz
Intel LGA 1150, 84 W, cores 4 , threads 4 threads, process technology 22 nm, 3.1 - 3.3 GHz, TurboBoost 3.3 - 3.7 GHz, maximum 32 GB, HD Graphics 4600
AMD AM4, 65 W, cores 6 , threads 12 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.6 GHz, TurboBoost 4.1 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz
AMD WRX8, 280 W, cores 16 - 64 , threads 32 - 128 threads, process technology 7 nm, 2.7 - 4 GHz, TurboBoost 4.5 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz
AMD AM4, 65 W, cores 8 , threads 16 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.7 / 3.8 GHz, TurboBoost 4.6 GHz, DDR4 3200 MHz, - / Radeon Vega 8
Intel LGA 1151 v2, 65 / 95 W, cores 6 , threads 6 threads, process technology 14 nm, 2.9 - 3.7 GHz, TurboBoost 4.1 - 4.6 GHz, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 2666 MHz, - / UHD Graphics 630
AMD AM4, 65 W, cores 6 , threads 12 threads, process technology 7 nm, 3.6 / 3.9 GHz, TurboBoost 4.2 - 4.6 GHz, maximum - / 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz
Intel LGA 1700, 65 / 125 W, cores 10 / 14 , 6P+4E, 6P+8E, threads 16 / 20 threads, process technology 10 nm, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, DDR5 4800 / 5600 MHz
AMD AM5, 65 - 120 W, cores 8 , threads 16 threads, process technology 5 nm, 3.8 - 4.5 GHz, TurboBoost 4.5 - 5.4 GHz, maximum 128 GB, DDR5 5200 MHz, Radeon
Intel LGA 1700, 65 - 150 W, cores 24 , 8P+16E, threads 32 threads, process technology 10 nm, TurboBoost 5.6 - 6 GHz, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, DDR5 5600 MHz, - / UHD Graphics 770
Intel LGA 1700, 65 / 125 W, cores 16 , 8P+8E, threads 24 threads, process technology 10 nm, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, DDR5 5600 MHz, - / UHD Graphics 770
Intel LGA 1200, 65 / 125 W, cores 8 , threads 16 threads, process technology 14 nm, 2.5 / 3.5 GHz, TurboBoost 5.1 / 5.2 GHz, maximum 128 GB, DDR4 3200 MHz, - / UHD Graphics 750
The main advantage of this processor is that you can use it until you buy a graphics card, thanks to the integrated graphics, and at the moment, this is a huge plus. For example, if you take the 5600G, it will later bottleneck any discrete card with a limited number of PCIe lanes and cut-down L3 cache - YouTube is full of tests with dismal results.